Italy Launches Centralized Gambling Dispute Portal this September
AI-GENERATEDItaly’s ADM is set to go live with the Portale delle segnalazioni on September 10, requiring 48 licensed operators to resolve player disputes within 72 hours.
A significant shift in digital player protection is underway in Italy. The Customs and Monopolies Agency (ADM), the body responsible for regulating gambling, has announced the launch of a new central complaint portal. Starting September 10, 2026, users will be able to submit official complaints against licensed online gambling operators via the Portale delle segnalazioni. This system is designed to make the dispute resolution process in the regulated market more transparent and faster by creating a direct interface between consumers, companies, and the regulatory authority.
The introduction of this portal is not an isolated step but is embedded in a far-reaching reorganization of the Italian online gambling market. The focus here is particularly on cybersecurity and consumer protection. To submit a complaint, players must identify themselves using their CIE electronic identity card or the SPID system. This ensures that only verified users use the system and prevents misuse through anonymous reports. The ADM emphasizes that this approach will strengthen the integrity of the market.
Numbers and facts
The financial framework of this market reorganization is considerable. A total of 48 operators have secured concessions as part of the new licensing system. Each of these licenses costs 7 million euros. These revenues flow, among other things, into increased monitoring and the technical infrastructure of the authorities. An important partner of the ADM is the state-owned IT group SOGEI. Together, they are working on a shield against illegal operators who act without an Italian license.
Strict time limits apply to the processing of complaints. As soon as a player submits a report via the portal, the operator concerned has exactly 72 working hours to react to it. Public holidays are excluded from this period. In the first phase, the ADM does not intervene actively, as the conflict should first be clarified directly between the customer and the licensee. Only if the answer is missing or the result is not satisfactory for the player can the case be escalated to the regulatory authority. Once the ADM makes a final decision, the case is considered closed and cannot be submitted again.
„The portal is designed to create a clearer process for handling disputes in the regulated market.“ - Spokesperson for ADM, Customs and Monopolies Agency Italy
Background
While the online sector is being modernized, there is stagnation in the land-based area. The government under Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has removed the corresponding reform decree for the retail sector from the parliamentary agenda for 2026 for the time being. The reason for this is disagreements between the Ministry of Finance and Italy's autonomous regions over license conditions and national rules. Roberto Alesse, Director of the ADM, has declared expanded supervision in the digital sector a priority, while stationary gambling halls and betting shops will probably not be able to count on new negotiations until 2027.
Why it matters for German players
For German players, the development in Italy is an interesting comparative value to the local State Treaty on Gambling 2021. In Germany, the Joint Gambling Authority of the States (GGL) takes on a similar role in monitoring. While Italy relies on a central portal for individual dispute cases, the focus in Germany is heavily on compliance with technical guidelines such as the deposit limit of 1,000 euros per month and the stake limit of 1 euro per spin for virtual machines. This data is monitored centrally via the LUGAS system.
In Germany, there are reporting forms for violations of player protection, but such a formalized portal with fixed response periods of 72 hours for operators does not yet exist in this form as a central arbitration board of the GGL. German customers often have to contact the customer service of the whitelist providers directly in the event of disputes or pursue civil law paths. The Italian solution could serve as a model here for how to channel communication between players and licensed casinos more efficiently to strengthen trust in the legal market.
What it means for GGL-licensed casinos
German casinos with a GGL license already have to meet the strictest requirements for IT security and data protection today. The cooperation between the Italian ADM and SOGEI shows that European regulators are increasingly relying on state IT expertise. For providers in Germany, this means that the regulatory air is getting thinner if processes are not automated and transparently documented. A central complaint system, such as Italy is now introducing, would mean an additional administrative burden for GGL-licensed companies, but at the same time separate the wheat from the chaff by identifying unreliable providers faster.
Italy's focus on cybersecurity also underlines the trend that gambling portals are no longer viewed only as entertainment platforms, but as critical infrastructures. Anyone holding a license in Germany should closely monitor developments in the neighboring country, as similar portals for consumer advice and complaints are repeatedly discussed at the level of EU regulation. The ADM is setting a standard here that massively increases the responsibility of the operators.
Frequently asked questions
When will the new Italian complaint portal start?
The portal named Portale delle segnalazioni officially goes online on September 10, 2026. It is part of a comprehensive digital market reorganization by the Italian authority ADM.
How quickly must gambling operators respond to complaints?
Licensed operators have a deadline of 72 working hours to respond to a submitted complaint. Public holidays are not included in this period calculation.
How much does a new online gambling license cost in Italy?
Under the new regulatory system, 48 operators have acquired concessions for 7 million euros each. These funds are used in part to finance stronger market monitoring.
How secure is the login for the new portal?
Users must register via state-recognized digital identity systems such as SPID or the CIE electronic identity card. This is intended to increase cybersecurity and ensure that only real account holders submit complaints.
What does this mean for players residing in Germany?
In Germany, the GGL is responsible for player protection, with limits through LUGAS and the OASIS lock file being the main focus here. A comparable central portal with a 72-hour response obligation for providers does not currently exist in Germany, but could be a future model for more transparency.
Share
About the author

Lisa Lustich
Editor-in-chief & casino tester
Lisa Lustich has been testing German-language online casinos since 1997 and runs the Lustich.de newsroom. More than 400 published reviews, certified player-protection advisor (BZgA training, 2019).
All articles by Lisa Lustich →Sources & further reading
- Joint Gambling Authority of the German Federal States (GGL): gluecksspiel-behoerde.de
- Whitelist of permitted online operators: GGL-Whitelist
- BZgA problem-gambling helpline: 0800 1 372 700 (free, anonymous, 24/7)
- Editorial methodology: Editorial guidelines Lustich.de
Gambling can be addictive. Please play responsibly. Help and counselling at 0800 1 372 700 (BZgA, free & anonymous).
Related topics
Further Reading
AI-GENERATEDSri Lanka Blacklists Bet365 and Unibet in Major Regulatory Crackdown
Sri Lanka’s new gambling authority has blocked 24 international operators, including Bet365 and Unibet, aiming for $250m in annual tax revenue.
AI-GENERATEDLawsuit Targets Mobile Betting in Wisconsin: Constitutional Clash Over New Sports Law
The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty is suing to block Act 247. A Marquette poll shows that 64 percent of residents oppose online sports betting.
AI-GENERATEDMexico's 1947 Gambling Law: Major Reforms and Tax Hikes Proposed
Mexico aims to overhaul its outdated 1947 gambling framework. Proposed measures include stricter ID checks for 400 venues and classifying gambling harm as a public health issue.










