Million Dollar Penalty: Tabcorp’s TAB Breaches Marketing Laws in Australia
AI-GENERATEDThe Australian regulator ACMA has fined betting brand TAB more than AU$2.7m for violating consumer marketing rules and ignoring opt-out requests.
Marketing failures can lead to massive financial consequences, as the latest enforcement action against Tabcorp’s flagship brand TAB demonstrates. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has ordered the operator to pay a penalty of more than AU$2.7m (approximately €1.4m). This fine follows an investigation that revealed systematic failures in complying with consumer protection and marketing rules between February 2024 and June 2025. It appears that the gambling giant repeatedly ignored the choices made by its customers regarding their privacy.
This incident is not the first time TAB has faced significant regulatory pressure. In 2024, the company paid over AU$4m for sending non-compliant marketing messages via SMS and WhatsApp to its VIP customers. The recurring nature of these breaches suggests deeper issues within the organization’s compliance framework. Despite ongoing efforts to revitalize the brand under new leadership and securing a long-term position in Victoria, these regulatory setbacks continue to haunt the Group. The ACMA has made it clear that a lack of technical oversight is no excuse for violating the rights of Australian citizens.
Numbers and facts
The specifics of the ACMA investigation are quite revealing. TAB made 351 telemarketing calls to individuals listed on Australia’s Do Not Call Register. Furthermore, 82 calls were placed outside permitted hours, and in nearly 4,000 instances, the callers failed to properly identify themselves or explain the purpose of the call. These actions represent a blatant disregard for established telemarketing standards designed to protect consumers from unwanted solicitation.
In addition to the telemarketing violations, TAB self-reported a significant error in 2025. Due to a systems glitch, more than 217,000 marketing emails and SMS messages were sent over a 16-day period to customers who had specifically opted out of those communication channels. Samantha Yorke, the ACMA Compliance Director, highlighted the severity of the situation:
“When people join the Do Not Call Register or unsubscribe from marketing messages, they are making a clear choice. Their choices must be respected – especially given the heightened risks of financial loss and psychological harm from gambling marketing.” - Samantha Yorke, ACMA Compliance Director
Yorke further noted that the scale and variety of the breaches indicate “serious weaknesses” in the operator’s compliance systems. Consequently, TAB has entered into a court-enforceable undertaking. The company must now commission an independent review of its systems, implement necessary improvements, and provide regular progress reports to the regulator.
Background
Tabcorp is currently in the middle of a strategic overhaul. Following the appointment of Gillon McLachlan as CEO and Jarrod Villani as a key executive in 2025, the company aims to modernize its operations. A major component of this strategy is the 20-year exclusive Victorian Wagering and Betting Licence. This deal is expected to provide a significant financial boost, with an estimated annual EBITDA uplift of AU$115m. However, consistently falling foul of the regulator could undermine the success of these long-term investments.
The broader Australian betting market is under intense scrutiny. According to the ACMA, gambling licence holders have paid more than AU$12m in penalties related to telemarketing and telecom failures over the last 18 months. This indicates a proactive stance by the regulator to ensure that all operators, regardless of their size, adhere to consumer protection laws.
Why it matters for German players
For players in Germany, this news serves as a reminder of why the current regulatory framework is so important. Under the State Treaty on Gambling 2021 (GlüStV 2021), marketing is strictly controlled to prevent exactly what happened in Australia. German-licensed casinos are monitored by the GGL, ensuring that when a player says "no" to marketing, that choice is permanent. Systems like LUGAS and OASIS provide a level of oversight that prevents aggressive marketing tactics.
The German market enforces a 1,000 Euro monthly deposit limit and a 1 Euro per spin cap on slots. Marketing must not target vulnerable groups or minors. If a German operator were to spam thousands of users who had opted out, the GGL would likely take immediate action, which could include the revocation of their licence. This highlights the safety net that a GGL-white-listed casino provides compared to offshore sites that often ignore player preferences and privacy.
What it means for GGL-licensed casinos
German casinos operating with a GGL licence must see this Australian case as a warning. Compliance is not just a checkbox; it requires robust IT systems and constant auditing. The failure at TAB was partially attributed to a technical error, but regulators often view such excuses as a lack of proper investment in player protection. In Germany, the industry is built on trust, and maintaining that trust requires impeccable data management and marketing ethics.
By choosing a regulated German casino, players ensure they are not part of an uncontrolled marketing database. The GGL ensures that every licensed operator follows the highest standards of data protection and consumer rights. The TAB scenario in Australia proves that even established giants can fail if they don't prioritize compliance. For the German player, the GGL licence remains the gold standard for a safe and respectful gaming experience.
Frequently asked questions
What penalty did the Tabcorp brand TAB have to pay?
The Tabcorp brand TAB was ordered by the Australian authority ACMA to pay a fine of over 2.7 million Australian dollars. This equates to approximately 1.4 million Euros.
What were the main reasons for the hefty fine against TAB?
The fine resulted from a massive disregard for customer privacy. TAB contacted thousands of individuals who had actively opted out of advertising, violating advertising bans and player protection rules.
Were there previous violations by Tabcorp?
Yes, in 2024 Tabcorp already had to pay over 4 million AU$ for sending impermissible SMS and WhatsApp messages to VIP customers.
How many calls did TAB make to individuals on the 'Do-Not-Call-List'?
The ACMA registered 351 calls to individuals listed on Australia's 'Do-Not-Call-List'. Furthermore, nearly 4,000 calls lacked clear identification of the caller or the reason for the call.
What are the implications of this case for players in Germany?
The incidents in Australia highlight the importance of strict regulations like Germany's Interstate Treaty on Gambling 2021 (GlüStV 2021). Players in Germany are better protected by systems like LUGAS and OASIS, and such a case would lead to license revocation here.
Share
About the author

Lisa Lustich
Editor-in-chief & casino tester
Lisa Lustich has been testing German-language online casinos since 1997 and runs the Lustich.de newsroom. More than 400 published reviews, certified player-protection advisor (BZgA training, 2019).
All articles by Lisa Lustich →Sources & further reading
Whitelist of permitted online operators
Editorial guidelines Lustich.de
BZgA problem-gambling helpline: 0800 1 372 700
Gambling can be addictive. Please play responsibly. Help and counselling at 0800 1 372 700 (BZgA, free & anonymous).
Read this article in 57 languages
- German
- English
- Portuguese
- French
- Italian
- Spanish
- Japanese
- Polish
- Arabic
- Dutch
- Russian
- Turkish
- Swedish
- Danish
- Norwegian
- Finnish
- Korean
- Hindi
- Indonesian
- Thai
- Vietnamese
- Chinese
- Czech
- Hungarian
- Romanian
- Greek
- Ukrainian
- Croatian
- Bulgarian
- Filipino
- Slovak
- Serbian
- Hebrew
- Persian
- Malay
- Bangla
- Tamil
- Telugu
- Urdu
- Georgian
- Khmer
- Albanian
- Kazakh
- Afrikaans
- Lithuanian
- Latvian
- Estonian
- Slovenian
- Uzbek
- Swahili
- Azerbaijani
- Amharic
- Tajik
- Kyrgyz
- Sinhala
- Hausa
- Nepali
Related topics
Further Reading
AI-GENERATEDNovig Sues Wisconsin Officials: Legal Battle Over Prediction Markets Escalates
Prediction market operator Novig has filed a lawsuit in Wisconsin, claiming its sports event contracts should fall under federal CFTC oversight rather than state gambling laws.
AI-GENERATEDTurkey Deploys AI and Financial Surveillance to Crush Illegal Gambling
The Turkish government is escalating its fight against the black market using AI. In 2025 alone, over 84,585 websites were blocked as authorities target financial flows.
AI-GENERATEDNigel Farage Scandal: Labour Urges Probe Into Tether.bet and Reform UK Donors
Political donations meet illegal gambling? The UK Labour Party is calling for a Gambling Commission probe into firms linked to Nigel Farage's close allies and donors.










