All Casino News in English
Spielerschutz

Australia: AU$75,000 Fine for Keno Operator Due to Self-Exclusion Failure

Editorially reviewed by Lisa LustichLast review:
Australien: 75.000 Dollar Strafe für Keno-Anbieter nach Selbstsperren-Fehler

The Victorian Gambling and Casino Control Commission has fined Keno Vic AU$75,000 after a self-excluded player managed to gamble via a second account.

In Victoria, Australia, regulators have sent a stern message to gambling operators regarding the sanctity of player protection measures. Keno Vic, a major licensee, has been hit with a significant financial penalty after failing to prevent a self-excluded individual from accessing its services. This case highlights the increasing scrutiny that operators face down under, where technical excuses for oversight are no longer accepted by the authorities.

The incident dates back to April 2024, when a customer chose to self-exclude from Keno Vic's platform. Despite this active ban, the same individual attempted to open a new account just five months later. While the automatic identity verification system initially placed the account on a restricted play status, it did not fully block the user from depositing funds and placing bets. The system's failure to flag the data match essentially allowed a vulnerable player to bypass their own protection. It was only during a manual withdrawal request that the duplicate identity was finally confirmed.

Numbers and facts

The Victorian Gambling and Casino Control Commission (VGCCC) imposed a fine of AU$75,000 on Keno Vic for this breach. The regulator pointed out that even though the customer intentionally tried to evade the verification rules, the ultimate responsibility lies with the operator. According to the investigation, the player gambled during a restricted period because the software failed to cross-reference similar naming conventions in the database.

"In this instance, Keno Vic’s systems failed to recognise the name similarity, and the person was able to gamble during the restricted play period." - Suzy Neilan, CEO of the VGCCC

This enforcement action follows a broader trend in Australia. Earlier this year, Entain was forced into a compliance review following over 500 breaches across its Ladbrokes and Neds brands. Last year, Unibet faced a staggering $1m fine for failing to close accounts linked to the national registry, BetStop. These figures show that the industry is under intense pressure to modernize its compliance technology.

Background

Australia is currently overhauling its gambling laws to create a safer environment for consumers. Central to this is BetStop, the national self-exclusion register, which requires operators to strictly verify all customers before they can place a single bet. In the Keno Vic case, the failure occurred because the internal system did not handle the transition between automated verification and manual oversight correctly. The VGCCC emphasized that the AU$75,000 fine is a proportionate response intended to act as a deterrent for other licensees.

Other major players like Tabcorp and SkyCity Adelaide are also facing legal headwinds. Tabcorp recently incurred an AU$2.7m fine for spam law breaches, illustrating that regulators are monitoring all aspects of operator conduct. The message is clear: if an operator cannot guarantee the integrity of its player protection systems, it will face heavy consequences.

Why it matters for German players

For players in Germany, this Australian case serves as a reminder of why the strict regulations under the Interstate Treaty on Gambling 2021 are so important. The German system relies on the OASIS database, which is mandatory for all GGL-licensed casinos. Unlike some offshore markets, the German regulator (GGL) ensures that self-exclusion is ironclad. If a player is registered in OASIS, it is virtually impossible to open a second account because of the real-time Schufa and LUGAS checks required by law.

Furthermore, the 1,000 Euro monthly deposit limit and the 1 Euro per spin cap on slots are designed to prevent the kind of financial damage seen in the Australian case. While some players find these rules restrictive, they provide a level of security that is often missing in unregulated MGA or Curacao markets. The Australian fine proves that even in regulated markets, constant vigilance from the authorities is necessary to keep players safe.

What it means for GGL-licensed casinos

German operators must take note that "customer intent to bypass controls" is not a valid legal defense. GGL-licensed casinos are expected to have sophisticated fuzzy-logic algorithms that can detect slight variations in names or addresses to prevent duplicate accounts. The AU$75,000 fine for Keno Vic is relatively small compared to potential penalties in Germany, where the GGL has the power to revoke licenses entirely for systemic failures. Operators must prioritize IT investment in compliance to avoid the reputational and financial damage of such public failures.

Sources & further reading

Gambling can be addictive. Please play responsibly. Help and counselling at 0800 1 372 700 (BZgA, free & anonymous).

Related topics